Rising applied sciences and present challenges – remarks on microchips and a surveillance society prompted by the fictional “Relationchip” – Official Weblog of UNIO – Cyber Tech

Maria Inês Costa (Managing Editor of this Weblog and PhD pupil on the Faculty of Legislation of College of Minho. FCT analysis scholarship holder – UI/BD/154522/2023)

An internet site launched only a few days earlier than Valentine’s Day, with a Portuguese area identify entitled “Relationchip” garnered some consideration in Portuguese social media for its progressive and controversial proposal to advertise transparency in romantic relationships: i.e., by way of using two subcutaneous microchips and an app. As reported on the product’s web site on the time of preliminary analysis for this publish – offering info and a setup that differs from the one at present accessible –, “as soon as implanted, the chips connect with the app and permit {couples} to entry options similar to real-time location monitoring, password synchronisation and shut contact alerts.”[1] Despite the fact that it raised suspicions that it may not be real, this product was being promoted on the web site as being able to decreasing misunderstandings in relationships and strengthening intimacy with family members.

And, in reality, it was revealed that this gadget was faux, a fictitious product created by the Portuguese Affiliation for Sufferer Help (APAV) to attract consideration to controlling behaviour in romantic relationships, which is now a part of younger folks’s day by day lives by way of cell phones and has change into normalised: that is the knowledge accessible on the web site on the time of writing this text. For days, the faux product’s web site was accessible, and criticism has already been levelled on the marketing campaign’s content material, provided that it could have influenced or corroborated concepts about controlling one’s intimate companion by way of using new applied sciences, particularly amongst younger folks.

It strikes us that, amongst different related issues, using the microchip idea on this marketing campaign is finally consistent with a broader dialogue about rising applied sciences which are difficult a collection of essential normative – and empirical – notions that are shedding stability in present occasions. Notably, one of many issues raised by this know-how falls inside the scope of exercising unprecedented management and subjecting somebody to a state of fixed surveillance.

Allow us to first think about some tendencies lately that assist us map the use and functions of microchip implants. Again in 2017, the Belgian firm NewFusion had proposed that its staff use radio frequency identification (RFID) chips[2] positioned of their fingers, whose info can be learn when in proximity to the reader, to which employees members voluntarily agreed.[3] This sparked some debate, notably over the opportunity of permitting fixed monitoring as know-how evolves and distance ceases to be an impediment.[4] Moreover, as others have argued, regardless of this being a voluntary process, staff might really feel compelled to adjust to firm coverage and have the chip implanted to keep away from unfavourable repercussions.[5]

In 2020, it was reported that Sweden was on the forefront of microchip implantation, with 1000’s of individuals utilizing them to carry out on a regular basis actions similar to accessing their smartphones, their very own houses, or setting an alarm, with some expressing hope that such know-how would permit them to do extra sooner or later, similar to finishing up funds.[6] And it didn’t take lengthy for this to change into a actuality, with the primary and solely implant from Polish start-up Walletmor enabling contactless funds, which is claimed to supply enhanced safety and 0 probability of theft.[7]

Extra lately, appreciable consideration was drawn to the primary microchip implant within the human mind in an American affected person, within the 12 months of 2024, developed by the corporate Neuralink. The affected person had been paralysed since 2016 and, with the chip, he asserts he has regained his independence, as he can now management a pc together with his ideas alone.[8] Within the EU, this growth even prompted the submission of a Parliamentary query with a request for a written reply from the Fee in March 2024,[9] the place the Fee was requested to offer solutions, inter alia, on the measures it meant to take to make sure respect for the rules of human dignity and elementary rights, particularly of sufferers. The reply on behalf of the European Fee offered the next month centered on the framework utilized to such implants as medical gadgets, due to this fact falling beneath the scope of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical gadgets (MDR).[10]

The rationale for mentioning this case is to spotlight that microchips used within the medical subject are totally different from these used for industrial functions. For instance, a microchip implanted in a affected person that interferes with mind exercise – with the purpose of serving to that particular person obtain a considerably higher high quality of life –, is a high-risk medical gadget that has totally different moral and authorized results[11] when in comparison with a subcutaneous microchip used for identification, entry and login, contactless funds, and many others.

Using the latter – whether or not to allegedly guarantee higher safety and scrutiny within the office, private monetary safety, higher privateness and luxury in day by day life – prompts a related dialogue on the unprecedent state of surveillance it could foster. The truth is, 20 years in the past, the European Group on Ethics (EGE) had recognised that “ICT implants, attributable to their community functionality might be misused in a number of methods for every kind of social surveillance or manipulation”, and that “the implantation of microchips with the potential for particular person and social types of management [was] already happening.”[12] With the precise case of RFID chips, there’s a manifest concern over people turning into simply  identifiable, since “the implanted   microchips   and   their   linked networks maintain a major quantity of knowledge,  together with  delicate  information  like  health-related  info.”[13]

These types of management are, in flip, in line with what’s postulated in biopolitics idea, whereby overt violence is changed by extra refined types of exercising energy.[14] And, more and more, what undergoes the train of this energy will not be solely organic life itself, nor a static social subject, however their intertwining. As Robert Esposito explains, “with the blurring of the excellence between the interior and the exterior (…) that has lengthy characterised sovereign energy, the latter is now in direct contact with issues of life and loss of life that not concern particular areas however the world in its entirety (…) legislation and politics seem more and more concerned in one thing that exceeds their normal designation, dragging them right into a dimension that goes past their conceptual equipment (…) and this turbulence is exactly the article of biopolitics.” [15] By Esposito’s perspective, we’re given a helpful lens of study by way of which we are able to see the authorized system and the political system interwoven with the purpose of regulating lives, that are, in flip, more and more mediated by know-how.

Certainly, with the appearance of applied sciences that not solely extensively course of the physique – similar to biometrics[16] – but in addition change into intimately intertwined with it – truly turning into a part of it – we face a novel entanglement of biology and know-how. This not solely poses vital dangers to folks’s well being and their proper to privateness, as an example, but in addition to their very id. Thus, what’s at stake will not be solely the regulatory work to assist defend the rights which are put in danger by the observe of implanting microchips, however a much wider dialogue in regards to the kinds of decisions we’re making which will intervene with the very actuality of being, on which the entire constructing of latest legislation is predicated.

On this regard, allow us to think about Michel Foucault’s seminal argument that normalisation can be the method of setting up an optimum mannequin, in response to which a longtime norm can be achieved. The “regular” would then finally be outlined as that which may align with and fulfill the norm. This course of is, due to this fact, one whereby the inhabitants are made to adapt to sure requirements of behaviour, not essentially by way of brute drive, however by making them internalise sure concepts.[17] If the erosion of the personal area turns into normalised, what can we make of the perfect of democracy? The truth is, privateness, along with being a non-public good, should even be understood as a public good in a constitutional democracy – and, as such, can’t be freely negotiated: it’s important for its sustainability.[18]

Using microchip implants reveals a particular entanglement between people and know-how, which in flip creates ontological stress, in addition to pointing in the direction of a extra clear society, whereby the area of intimacy more and more loses floor.  Certainly, as applied sciences evolve to more and more merge with our real-time experiences, we might lose observe of the boundaries that separate intimate from public life. Though, so far as we all know, there are nonetheless no microchips accessible to supposedly enhance romantic relationships by way of what can solely be certified as a lack of privateness, there isn’t any assure that such concepts won’t achieve traction and materialise, reinforcing and normalising new types of management.

If there may be any phenomenon that we now have witnessed with rising frequency in current occasions, it’s the growth of applied sciences with profound impacts on the authorized and moral panorama, similar to synthetic intelligence (AI), and the authorized system’s efforts to maintain tempo with the improvements and challenges that such applied sciences introduce. On this regard, it will likely be necessary to stay vigilant to future developments in using implantable microchips, given the same – but in addition novel – issues that it could increase.


[1] See https://mudaochip.pt/.

[2] “Radio frequency identification, abbreviated as RFID, is an automated identification methodology counting on storing and remotely retrieving information, utilizing gadgets known as RFID tags or transponders. An RFID tag is an object that may be utilized to or integrated right into a product for the needs of identification by way of using radio waves.” See Eurostat, “Glossary: Radio frequency identification (RFID)”, n.d.,  https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary:Radio_frequency_identification_(RFID).

[3] Euronews, “Chips within the hand to establish who we’re”, 14 February 2017, https://www.euronews.com/subsequent/2017/02/14/chips-in-the-hand-to-identify-who-we-are.

[4] Plixavra Vogiatzoglou, “Microchipping people: a futuristic utopia or a dystopian future?”, KU LEUVEN – CITIP, 11 April 2017, https://www.legislation.kuleuven.be/citip/weblog/microchipping-humans-a-futuristic-utopia-or-a-dystopian-future/.

[5] Shainaz Firfiray, “Microchip implants are threatening employees’ rights”, 22 November 2018, https://warwick.ac.uk/information/knowledge-centre-archive/enterprise/work/microchipping/.

[6] Lauren Chadwick & Ric Wasserman, Will microchip implants be the subsequent huge factor in Europe?, Euronews, 12 Might 2020, https://www.euronews.com/well being/2020/05/12/will-microchip-implants-be-the-next-big-thing-in-europe.

[7] See https://walletmor.com/pages/safety.

[8] See Lara Lewington, Liv McMahon & Tom Gerken, “The person with a mind-reading chip in his mind – because of Elon Musk”, BBC Information, 23 March 2025, https://www.bbc.co.uk/information/articles/cewk49j7j1po. See additionally Alex Hern, “Elon Musk says Neuralink has implanted its first mind chip in human”, The Guardian, 30 January 2024, https://www.theguardian.com/know-how/2024/jan/29/elon-musk-neuralink-first-human-brain-chip-implant.

[9] European Parliament, Parliamentary query – E-000732/2024 – Moral and authorized facets of mind chips – the implications of microchip implants for human rights, 7 March 2024, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc/E-9-2024-000732_EN.html.

[10] Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical gadgets, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC.

[11] Even when there’s a related overlap of sure facets, specifically relating to privateness.

[12] European Group on Ethics, “Moral facets of ICT implants within the human physique: opinion introduced to the Fee by the European Group on Ethics”, MEMO/05/97, Brussels, 17 March 2005.

[13] Tayyibe Bardakçı, “Privateness, surveillance, and implanting RFID microchips to people”, Worldwide Journal of Human and Well being Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1 (2024): 90, https://doi.org/10.31344/ijhhs.v8i1.626.

[14] Alexandre Franco de Sá, “Prefácio”, in Bios. Biopolítica e filosofia, trans. M. Freitas da Costa, Robert Esposito (Lisboa: Edições 70, 2010), VII.

[15] Robert Esposito, Bios. Biopolítica e Filosofia, trans. M. Freitas da Costa (Lisboa: Edições 70, 2010), 30. Excerpt freely translated by the writer.

[16] On the topic, see different posts on this weblog: José Vegar Velho, “Trying id within the eye: transient issues on the frontiers of biometric information and id”, The Official Weblog of UNIO – Pondering and Debating Europe, 7 October 2025, Maria Inês Costa, “Iris assortment as a proof of personhood: present tendencies on biometric recognition”, The Official Weblog of UNIO – Pondering and Debating Europe, 17 Might 2024,

[17] See Michel Foucault, Vigiar e Punir, trans. Pedro Elói Duarte (Lisbon: Edições 70), 2013.

[18] Mireille Hildebrandt, “Chapter 23 – Expertise and the tip of Legislation”, in Going through the boundaries of the legislation, ed. B. Keirsbilck, W. Devroe, E. Claes (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2009), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79856-9_23448.


Image credit score: by Jakub Zerdzicki on pexels.com.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

x